tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8829798408217308876.post5664257931102141569..comments2024-02-07T08:19:02.043+01:00Comments on Sunny Talks Tech: Continuous Integration System RoundupSaptarshi Purkayasthahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01568273618209769803noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8829798408217308876.post-54787738988201052352008-11-21T23:04:00.000+01:002008-11-21T23:04:00.000+01:00I am with Atlassian and think that Bamboo would be...I am with Atlassian and think that Bamboo would be a great fit for the OpenMRS project providing both powerful <A HREF="http://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo/features/" REL="nofollow">out-of-the-box features</A> as well as a great <A HREF="http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/BAMEXT/Home" REL="nofollow">plugin architecture</A>. Let me know if you want to discuss further..Ken Olofsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04476808411276847989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8829798408217308876.post-61261926152198164732008-11-21T22:14:00.000+01:002008-11-21T22:14:00.000+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Ken Olofsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04476808411276847989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8829798408217308876.post-43221006478939800022008-11-21T10:15:00.000+01:002008-11-21T10:15:00.000+01:00From my experience, Atlassian products (specifical...From my experience, Atlassian products (specifically JIRA and Confluence) tend to be way slow from developing-world connections. For example, TRAC on openmrs.org works waaaay better for me than JIRA on the pih server.... though maybe the pih server is just slower.Chase Yarbroughhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06918543102946191980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8829798408217308876.post-4740535353961663682008-11-21T08:05:00.000+01:002008-11-21T08:05:00.000+01:00Hudson is great, but if you have alot of unit test...Hudson is great, but if you have alot of unit tests then it is a big memory hog due to the way it parses the junit xml output to provide reports. I can't use it currently because my build machine runs out of memory. Hopefully, that will be fixed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8829798408217308876.post-26372601914156650272008-11-21T06:20:00.000+01:002008-11-21T06:20:00.000+01:00Burke, from the testing I realized that Bamboo and...Burke, from the testing I realized that Bamboo and Hudson are pretty close to what we would want to implement. Bamboo is better out-of-the-box, while Hudson is really about extensibility with plugins... If we don't have the inclination to customize with our own plugins, it seems like Bamboo should do us good.Saptarshi Purkayasthahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02150365921018070686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8829798408217308876.post-80861925369901888602008-11-21T04:54:00.000+01:002008-11-21T04:54:00.000+01:00Nicely done, Sunny. Thanks for this due diligence...Nicely done, Sunny. Thanks for this due diligence. Looking at the table, there doesn't seem to be one that stands out from the crowd. I'm still leaning toward Bamboo, since we are migrating toward other Atlassian products (like Confluence, Crowd, and Crucible). Are there any other aspects of these tools that would set them apart or outweigh the benefit of using Bamboo if we're adopting other Burkehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11975703679040892322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8829798408217308876.post-30878834931865693512008-11-20T12:35:00.000+01:002008-11-20T12:35:00.000+01:00Cruise, the commercial CI tool, is a very differen...<A HREF="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/cruise-continuous-integration/features-and-benefits" REL="nofollow">Cruise</A>, the commercial CI tool, is a very different beast from CruiseControl and has significantly more features. <BR/>It is by no means simply a paid version of the old Cruise. <BR/>And yes, as you pointed out, it's free for Open Source projects.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11938300811286150164noreply@blogger.com